Week 5: Additive Manufacturing

pageZine: 3D-printers & Being editorspageWorkshop Amstelstation

We started off exploring the 3D-printers by using a file from the internet.

This print turned our fine. There was no need to interrupt the printer, good start of the week:

  1. Warp: Bended and connected on the top.

2. Overhang: Turned out OK, the layers in the overhang ended up more rough at the most sloping ones tho.

3. Spike: Details of the spike were not as visable as we hoped.

4. Pyramide: The pyramide ended up better than the spike, all good.

5. Rounded print: Rounding in the middle turned out smoothly.

6. Nut: The nut had almost the exact measurements that was shown in the 3d model.

7. Star: Does have sharp edges

8. Text: Turned out less wide than expected, but still readable.

9. Hole size: Smaller than they should be; a difference of about 0,3mm.

10. Minimum distance: The distance of the cuts are a little smaller than they should be. The printer also rounded the edges at the end of the print, instead of making them square.

11. Sphere: The sphere turned out great.

12. Minimum walls: It is clear where the printer started printing. The line starts rounded on the left of the print.

13. Wave: The wave turned out fine. The ultimaker printer prints rounded shapes/waves better than straight ones.

14. Bridge print: Has been printed without support. The filament is printed in the air at this point between the bridges. Smallest and longest bridge point are equal.

15. Surface: The surface is flat, not smooth tho.

16. 3D print font: Did not merge. The numbers are readable, only the holes of the 6 & 8 were a small problem.

17. Hole: Did not fall flat. The hole was 0.2mm thinner than it should have been.

18. Z-height: The difference between the steps were accurate. The ultimaker/printer made a layer around the entire print, so it we were not able tell if the first step turned out the way it should

Inspiration

Own work

Last updated